Second, this paper questions the notion of central coherence as a central mechanism responsible for providing both perceptual and conceptual coherence in both visual and verbal domains. A first issue addressed concerns the assumption that superior processing for parts is the result of an impairment in the ability to integrate information (i.e., global processing). In the non-verbal domain, weak central coherence is held to account for the superior performance individuals with autism show on the Embedded Figures test (Shah and Frith, 1983 Jolliffe and Baron-Cohen, 1997), and on the Block Design test (Shah and Frith, 1993). The aim of this paper will be to reflect on different aspects of the concept of central coherence. Together these recent findings represent a serious challenge for the weak central coherence account, which assumes that context-processing difficulties are a. individual with autism is at least consistent with weak central coherence theory. Although this theory has been successful at explaining aspects of autism that other theories, such as the 'theory of mind' account or executive function theory cannot explain, central coherence theory suffers from a major theoretical drawback, namely the over-extension and vagueness of the definition of central coherence. Perceptual weak central coherence may be more likely the result of abnormal or weakened gestalt processes, responsible for the integration of the component. Second, this paper questions the notion of central coherence as a central mechanism responsible for providing both perceptual and conceptual coherence in both visual and verbal domains.ĪB - Weak central coherence theory (Frith, 1989) has had a great impact in the study of autism. The aim of this paper will be to reflect on different aspects of the concept of central coherence. Although this theory has been successful at explaining aspects of autism that other theories, such as the 'theory of mind' account or executive function theory cannot explain, central coherence theory suffers from a major theoretical drawback, namely the over-extension and vagueness of the definition of central coherence. N2 - Weak central coherence theory (Frith, 1989) has had a great impact in the study of autism. T1 - Teoría de la coherencia central: una revisión de los supuestos teóricos = Central coherence theory: a review of theoretical assumptions
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |